Thank you Roosterman. I applaud your efforts to take on this challenge. Have you seen the Stroh uke pictures I posted on my page also? Weight really should not be a problem. Note how the uke has a stand to rest on your leg. A 4 string tenor guitar would be perfect. I would be fasinated if the tone sounded like a 78 RPM record being played on an old Victrola. Best Wishes for a successful build. Please keep me posted. Enjoy.
Thank you Mark for your detailed comment. Being a big resonator guitar fan, mainly for reasons of volume and the unique resophonic sound created, I personally think this would offer a unique old time gramophone record tone. Even if it needs a boost from a piezo, the tone might be worth it. It certainly would not be easy to create one that actually functioned effectively. I think one of the main problems might be the difference bewtween a violin attack and a guitar attack. A violin bow drawn across the strings transmits a steady stream of vibrational energy. A guitar receives quick sharp strikes. Strumming might be possible. This very difference might be the killer. I understand your point of the basic aim of CBG. I'm a big fan of the pursuit of those who strive to build a quality simple instrument too. Resonator guitars are definitely in the shadow of standard guitars too. I thought I would put it out there for interest. There are many builders out there experimenting with different resonator cones. I always encourage builders to try to take their paper dreams into the physical world. Who knows what may come to light. Thanks for sharing. Enjoy.
It's definitely possible to build a guitar-type instrument working like a stroh-viol. I've seen descriptions and pictures of a "stroh-uke" and the following link should take you to a pic of a stroh guitar (although a lap steel type guitar not a regular one).
As I see it, the real issues determining whether it's worth building a CBG version are complexity and sound quality.
Complexity could be an issue because the bridge arrangements on these things weren't simple. It seems to me that part of the beauty of the whole CBG thing is in the simplicity of the instruments and the joy of getting great sounds out of something that's apparently crude. So a stroh-CBG seem to cut across that ethos. But if your take on CBGs is more about wacky and unconventional stuff for the sheer hell of it then this isn't a problem.
Perhaps the real killer is sound quality. Would it sound any good? Obviously there's only one way to find out for sure but it would be a bummer to put loads of effort into a complicated instrument only to have it sound a lot worse than something much simpler. The main aim of the stroh-viol design was to project sound in a directional way and I fear that might have come at the expense of compromises in tonal quality. Obviously the ultimate decision about whether you like a sound is a subjective thing and maybe a stroh-guitar would give a novel and quirky sound that isn't like other guitars but is still worth having.
I might have a go at one eventually but it's not high on my list of potential projects.
Replies
My mate has a violin like this. Its a modern copy, but still cost a lot of money. Sound wise its ok, but the real trouble is how heavy it is.
http://www.frets.com/FRETSPages/Museum/Ukulele/StroviolsUke/strohuk...
http://www.cigarboxnation.com/photo/stroh-gramophone-guitar
http://www.elderly.com/vintage/items/images/300U/464-10_inside.jpg
As I see it, the real issues determining whether it's worth building a CBG version are complexity and sound quality.
Complexity could be an issue because the bridge arrangements on these things weren't simple. It seems to me that part of the beauty of the whole CBG thing is in the simplicity of the instruments and the joy of getting great sounds out of something that's apparently crude. So a stroh-CBG seem to cut across that ethos. But if your take on CBGs is more about wacky and unconventional stuff for the sheer hell of it then this isn't a problem.
Perhaps the real killer is sound quality. Would it sound any good? Obviously there's only one way to find out for sure but it would be a bummer to put loads of effort into a complicated instrument only to have it sound a lot worse than something much simpler. The main aim of the stroh-viol design was to project sound in a directional way and I fear that might have come at the expense of compromises in tonal quality. Obviously the ultimate decision about whether you like a sound is a subjective thing and maybe a stroh-guitar would give a novel and quirky sound that isn't like other guitars but is still worth having.
I might have a go at one eventually but it's not high on my list of potential projects.
mike anderson said: