I have wired a disc piezo and a rod piezo in parallel through a simple active (9V) endpin Jack preamp. I tested it before installing, by tapping them on the table. The disc piezo cane through strong. The rod piezo was faint. I plugged a different rod piezo (by itself) into the preamp, and its signal was strong (as loud as the disc had been).

I thought maybe I had messed the first rod up when wiring it and the disc together. So I took the second rod piezo (the one that tested strong by itself) and soldered it and the disc in parallel, then plugged them into the preamp. This time I took extra care in wiring and soldering them. I am absolutely certain I have wired them correctly, in terms of negative and positive, with no shorts. Same result. The disc signal is loud, but the rod signal is faint.

Is there something about the different signal strengths of discs and rods that makes a rod come through quieter than a disc when wired in parallel through the same preamp?

I don’t know if these details make any difference to the question, but the disc is somewhat oversized (2 inches metal diameter), and the disc is wired with slightly thicker gauge wire than the rod (which is wired via the standard shielded wire with the woven outer shield/ground).

Any ideas?

Views: 102

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's too early for my brain to properly function, the coffee hasn't kicked in yet and I've got to get out the door and head to work but... I'm guessing it has something to do with the rod piezo being made up of 6 small individual piezos connected in series. So when you add the disk you have a mixed parallel/series network. Why this results in low output of the rod I don't have time to figure out right now... but maybe knowing this will send you down the right path for research.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/510519ace4b0869f641519d9/t/5b76e87a03ce647041c08d8e/1534519440162/BLOGIMG+-+Piezo+Pickups+-+Piezo+Pickup+Basic+Construction.png

I thought about the fact that the rod is really several piezo wired in series, but I can’t see how that would cause the rod to be quieter than the disc. After the signal leaves the rod (via the hookup wire in your diagram), the hookup wires from the rod & disk then merge into one wire which plugs into the preamp. In other words, the wiring system looks like a “Y,” with a disc on one fork or branch of the “Y,” and a rod (several piezos in series) on the other branch.

Wiring piezo in series increases the impedance across the whole system, not just the branch of the system where the in series piezo are. So if increased impedance were causing a signal decrease, I would think it should affect both branches in the system (the branch where the disc is as well as the branch where the rod is), not just the branch where the piezos are in series (the rod branch).

Thoughts?

The piezo elements used in the Rod type piezo is of a different type. They have less output and less sensitivity than the larger round piezo type.

sounds like the disk is shorting the rod.  If you wire a 100 ohm resister in parallel with a 1 ohm resister, you get a result of 0.99 ohms. perhaps wiring them in series instead?

I’m not sure I follow you about the resistors, but having th tripple-checked and built it twice, swapping out for a new rod the second time, I am confident I have no shorts, bad solder joints, or Reversed polarities.

Since the piezos on each fork or branch of my system (disc on one and rod on the other) are generating their own separate electrical signal separately from each other from the vibration they each respectively experience, Absent some kind of wiring flaw, I don’t see how the electrical signal generated at the end of one branch of the “Y” (the end of the piezo branch) would ever travel into or through the other branch of the “Y” (the disc branch). The disc is not along the piezo signal’s path to ground, and they do not form a loop.

Am I making sense?

If you connect the rod and disk in parallel, any signal created by one travels not only down to the volume pot but also backwards up the other's wire.

think of one as a 12v battery and the other as a 6v battery. 

Correcting a typo:

“I don’t see how the electrical signal generated at the end of one branch of the “Y” (the end of the ROD piezo branch). . .”

Could be the polarity of the disk doesn't match the wire colors? Try switching them.

Rod Piezo's have less output than the round disc type which is why most people use a preamp with the rod piezo. Rod piezo's have less handling noise and less attitude that gives them better acoustic tone.

You could put the round disc piezo in the neck area of your git and the rod piezo in the bridge to give them a more equal performance. You could use a on/on/on 3-way switch to use either or both in parallel. You may also have a preamp bypass lug on your jack to wire up the disc piezo?

This is what I suspected: That discs simply have more output than rods.

Why would putting the disc piezo in the neck area give them a more equal performance? Is that because there is less vibration in the neck (where the disc would be) than in the saddle (where the rod would be)?

partly because the vibrations at the neck would be less than the bridge but mainly because these rods are supposed to be under compression, directly under the bridge piece.

Correct. The string vibration will be stronger at the bridge area and the rod needs to be under string pressure at the bridge.

So you'll be lessening the output for the disc at the neck area and giving the rod piezo the most exposure to try and equal out the output.

Disc piezo at the neck and body junction will have a more mellow/warm tone. Upper low string side of the neck for more bass, lower high string side for more treble.

RSS

The Essential Pages

New to Cigar Box Nation?How to Play Cigar Box GuitarsFree Plans & How to Build Cigar Box GuitarsCigar Box Guitar Building BasicsCigar Box Guitar Parts Store

Site Sponsor

 

Recommended Links & Resources

Forum

Fret press anyone?

Started by Ducati Scotty in Building Secrets, Tips, Advice, Discussion. Last reply by Taffy Evans 52 minutes ago. 11 Replies

VIDEO & PICS: Reso Bass by Jason Mills of Highwood Guitars

Started by Shane Speal shanespeal.com in Feature Articles. Last reply by Jason Mills 7 hours ago. 21 Replies

PDF Download: How to Tie Fret Knots - a Traditional Way of Fretting

Started by Shane Speal shanespeal.com in Feature Articles. Last reply by Busyhands Slim 19 hours ago. 1 Reply

PDF Download: Build a "Two Hour" Hammered Dulcimer

Started by Shane Speal shanespeal.com in Feature Articles. Last reply by Shane Speal shanespeal.com yesterday. 2 Replies

VIDEO - Building Guitars with Antique Cigar Boxes

Started by Shane Speal shanespeal.com in Feature Articles. Last reply by Lonman yesterday. 6 Replies

PDF Download: Build a Super Tub Bass (improved upright gutbucket bass)

Started by Shane Speal shanespeal.com in Feature Articles. Last reply by James Matthews on Saturday. 3 Replies

Fret board Length

Started by Tim Castagnola in Building Secrets, Tips, Advice, Discussion. Last reply by Paul Craig on Saturday. 19 Replies

Latest Activity

Tom T replied to Emil Palmgren's discussion Weird buzzing sound
"Good video you attached, but it is hard to hear the buzz with internet connections and cheap…"
1 minute ago
Dave Lynas commented on Uncle John's blog post Cali-Fest Open Mic signups.
"Great Uncle! We can play through the tunes together out in the Sonora looking for water and food…"
10 minutes ago
Emil Palmgren posted a discussion

Weird buzzing sound

Hello! new member here and i have not posted yet so i think it's time! Sadly not for a good…See More
18 minutes ago
Uncle John commented on Andries D. EKER's video
Thumbnail

Weary Blues The Basterd Kid from HankWilliams BCB One Man Blues Band 2019

"Andries,  I had to shovel a little snow last night and this morning.  Pretty night skies…"
41 minutes ago
Taffy Evans replied to Ducati Scotty's discussion Fret press anyone?
"Yes I have always put a "V" in the top of the slot. That is done mainly to assist in the…"
52 minutes ago
Clarky commented on Clarky's video
58 minutes ago
Andries D. EKER commented on Andries D. EKER's video
Thumbnail

Weary Blues The Basterd Kid from HankWilliams BCB One Man Blues Band 2019

"I was worn out from sjuffeling SNOW round the House, cose the van cant get out to go south, but…"
59 minutes ago
Andries D. EKER commented on Dave Lynas's video
Thumbnail

Calli Fest Snowbound Blues

"Way to GO ! Dave ! whits Woman ? you got a lead on them? maybee introduce us later! fine Blues…"
1 hour ago
Uncle John commented on Dave Lynas's video
Thumbnail

Calli Fest Snowbound Blues

"Oh, Meester Lynas.  I was liking it and then you started singing those good lyrics and I was…"
1 hour ago
Uncle John commented on Andries D. EKER's video
Thumbnail

Weary Blues The Basterd Kid from HankWilliams BCB One Man Blues Band 2019

"The main deal is having fun and this is BIG FUN."
1 hour ago
Andries D. EKER commented on Andries D. EKER's video
Thumbnail

Weary Blues The Basterd Kid from HankWilliams BCB One Man Blues Band 2019

"Hi  there Keith ! dono if flag waving in the mail is a good ideer , but if he likes it , i…"
1 hour ago
Andries D. EKER commented on Andries D. EKER's video
Thumbnail

Weary Blues The Basterd Kid from HankWilliams BCB One Man Blues Band 2019

"No thats me doing a Hank lyric im no immitator you know by now ! UJ  well i did  forget…"
1 hour ago

Music

Loading…

© 2019   Created by Ben "C. B. Gitty" Baker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

\uastyle>\ud/** Scrollup **/\ud.scrollup {\ud background: url("https://api.ning.com/files/Stym6V-ACBaiDP5ilIPA6bJ3rn0ZdlI1EwGHWgROvEkwiCCaNgzJRcZTZH8OGkV3fvK-NboXjThXltWFbcihM-jI4Mwz5SV3/scrollup_icon.png") no-repeat scroll 0 0 transparent;\ud bottom: 25px;\ud display: inline !important;\ud height: 40px;\ud opacity: 0.3 !important;\ud position: fixed;\ud right: 30px;\ud text-indent: -9999px;\ud width: 40px;\ud z-index: 999;\ud}\ud.scrollup:hover {\ud opacity:0.99!important;\ud}\ud \uascript type="text/javascript">\ud x$(document).ready(function(){\ud x$(window).scroll(function(){\ud if (x$(this).scrollTop() > 100) {\ud x$('.scrollup').fadeIn();\ud } else {\ud x$('.scrollup').fadeOut();\ud }\ud });\ud x$('.scrollup').click(function(){\ud x$("html, body").animate({ scrollTop: 0 }, 600);\ud return false;\ud });\ud });\ud \ua!-- End Scroll Up -->